Case study: More content is not always better for ranking in Google
Content is king in SEO, but it’s critical that it’s the right type of content for your target audience and the SERP landscape for each client.
The situation. Last year, Sterling Sky worked with a personal injury lawyer client in Florida that wasn’t ranking very well for some of the main keywords that they were targeting. Prior to working with us, the law firm had another company set up dozens of boilerplate service area pages targeting social security disability terms. Each page was focused on an individual city or service area but provided no real value to the users who visited those pages.
The issue. The pages had the following characteristics:
- Very similar content. The location served as the main difference in most of the service area pages. This is a common tactic for businesses that target multiple areas in hopes of driving traffic for searchers looking specifically for “keyword + location.”
- Created with the intent to rank in those cities. Because the content was built with the sole intention to show up in search results, it didn’t serve the needs of the searchers.
- No links. The individual service area pages had almost no incoming links (or internal links), so there was hardly any way for search engines or searchers to find them.
- No traffic. Due to the factors above, the services area pages were not helping the local business site in any way, and, in fact, could have been contributing to cruft.
The solution. Because the pages weren’t adding value to the site, mainly due to points three and four listed above, we made the decision to delete them all and redirect them to the main pages on the site that were about social security disability.
The result. Within weeks of doing this, my colleague Carrie Hill saw big increases in their local pack rankings for “social security disability attorney.” Here is the change using the ranking tool Places Scout: